• About
  • Music Writing
    • Music reviews
    • Music live reviews
    • Music news and opinion
      • Monday Musings
      • Saturday Summary
  • Other Writing
    • Fiction
      • Ölnezea
      • Solar System Story: an extract
      • City Story: an extract
    • Poetry
      • A Pastiche Of Neruda
      • Algebra
      • Big Pictures
      • Do Little But Live Much
      • Echoes
      • Grey Town Sky
      • I Saw A Thing Today
      • Sun’s Poodle
      • The Burial
      • This Land Is Real
      • Three Points Of The Triangle
      • Tissue Of Truths
      • Vasco
  • Music
    • Leaf
  • Blog
RSS  Subscribe:  RSS feed
Oliver Arditi
News and reviews focussed on local, independent, leftfield, experimental, progressive or plain good music.

Various Artists – Album Roundup

Posted on December 1, 2011

0


Red Orchid – Blood Vessels & Marshmallows (post-rock)

self released, 2011, DD album, 1hr 22s

$5 (CD album $12)


http://redorchid.bandcamp.com
/


http://www.redorchidbloom.com
/

Heavy rock music of various sorts has  a long standing relationship with the avant-garde, and the more ‘serious’ end of ‘popular’ music (I may put a lot of ‘things’ in quote marks, but it’s not my ‘fault’ if every term in ‘music’ means something other than its ‘literal’ definition!). Metal’s most fertile ongoing point of intersection is in the place where black metal meets drone, a set of practices many of which exist in the rarified air of ‘modern music’, well away from the popular. There is however a parallel area, a less abstruse zone, where some of the more thoughtful metal practitioners find themselves drifting into post-rock territory. (The term ‘post-metal’ is floating about, but I’ll be giving it a decade or so before I decide what it meant.)

Red Orchid play a brand of post-rock (with a modicum of singing) that includes an obvious, but not defining, influence of the heavy. It’s enough to make them stand out, but in a way that doesn’t disrupt the general accessibility of the genre, with a lot of nice textures and pleasing melodic materials in play. Blood Vessels & Marshmallows is an exemplary album, in that it is serious, creative, even experimental music, yet there is nothing about it that is deliberately exclusive; there is nothing to listen past to get at the meanings of the work, and while this dissembles, rather than erases difficulties, it obviously gives the band’s message a much broader reach.

Artists in other, more ‘arty’ genres have realised that there’s a lot to say with simple harmonies and pleasing textures. The piano line in ‘Drown With Me’ reminds me of EST, not just in its melodic contour, but in its faux-tentative phrasing, which just goes to show how far Red Orchid throw their net. There’s a lot to listen to here, and there’s a lot that just sounds good. I’ll be spending some quality time with this record.

 

Coeus The Boxing Titan – The Boxing Titan Spawns (industrial rock)

self-released, 2011, DD album, 1hr 20s

$3.50 +


http://coeustheboxingtitan.bandcamp.com/album/the-boxing-titan-spawns


http://www.coeustheboxingtitan.com/

I always enjoy hearing rock music that’s progressive, as opposed to ‘progressive rock’, which for bizarre historical reasons means rock music that’s conservative. Coeus The Boxing Titan (what a name!) incorporate a lot of artfully shaped electronic elements into their sound, in a way that can sensibly be described as industrial rock, but without really sounding like any other industrial rock. They also incorporate sounds from elsewhere in the rock pantheon, such as the lovely electric piano tinkles to be heard in ‘This Time’.

In fact, there’s a lot of electric piano on this album, which is one factor in its uniqueness: more important though is its approach to using its various sonic resources, in which distortions are given space to articulate themselves, and sounds are valued for their individual character, rather than all being hammered together into a homogenous stream of industrial rock plasma. There’s a sense of something assembled from components, not vacuum moulded, something that could fall apart if someone was going to the trouble of holding it all together creatively.

That creativity is equally manifest in the writing, with melodies that are pretty straightforward, but not bound by conventionality, as in the echoes of Scottish pipe tunes I could hear in ‘February, This Is For You’. This music has been lovingly crafted, but by hands that know when to stop fiddling, and certainly do not smooth off all the rough edges. It has been crafted to a strong artistic agenda, as well, one that stalks menacingly across its soundscapes like Coeus himself might (if he actually had any part to play in the mythology that spawned him). This is great. I’m officially recommending it.

 

Pixieguts – I Sand (electronica)

self released, 2011, DD album, 57m 8s

$name your price


http://pixieguts.bandcamp.com/album/i-sand


http://pixieguts.com
/

Pixieguts is one of those intarwebz connections: a Twitter friend said nice things about a collaborative project of hers, which I followed up (and will soon be reviewing), so I thought I’d check out her own stuff. I Sand is her most recent release. It compiles a number of collaborations, tracks credited to other artists, to whom she lends her vocals. The earlier releases available from her Bandcamp page are similar, but there the music is all ascribed to her, with a (recurring) crew of collaborators credited. It’s not clear if this is merely a shift in emphasis, or a change in her working practices. Either way, single artistic statement or artfully curated compilation, the album is pretty coherent in sound and style, although it is also varied enough to keep the listener on their toes.

There’s some euphoric sounding funky house (‘The Beat Of You’ by Voide), some skittering electro (‘Blink Blink’ by Adrian Carter), a strongly Eurythmics flavoured synth ballad (‘Distant’ by Max Waves), some more glitchy, experimental textures… All are produced to a very high standard, and all are animated by Pixieguts’ smooth, smoky contralto. I’m assuming that the usual arrangement is they produce, she sings, but I could be wrong (and I’m too lazy to ask her).

Although it has an obvious influence on the atmosphere of each track to have the same voice in it, the singer herself has clearly chosen to work with these people, and there are distinct similarities, across their disparate styles. There’s a bright, transparent ambience, almost a Brazilian feel to the tracks, and although in some ways there are major contrasts, it still makes perfect aural sense for these tunes to be presented together. Pixieguts is a truly excellent singer, and the material is great. Give this a listen.

 

Run For It – No You Ain’t, We Is (pop punk)

Painted Ox Records, 2011, DD album, 31m 49s

£3.49 (iTunes)


http://www.stereokiller.com/RunForIt


http://www.paintedoxrecords.com
/

Mining the crack between punk’s energy and the heart-on-sleeve melodicism of heartland rock (with particular echoes of Tom Petty), Run For It pursue their goals with admirable single-mindedness. Pop punk has undergone a sonic transformation over the years, from a sparse and angular affair, full of skittish jangling and, well, space, into a pumped up, full range piledriver, formed from guitar sounds so thick and rich they would once have been instantly classified as heavy rock. Ironically enough, No You Ain’t, We Is’s guitar sounds frequently remind me of Never Mind The Bollocks, a record that never really sounded very punk, and the most produced album of the first wave. Everything is layered up, compressed and normalised until the effect becomes almost claustrophobic, and although there are certainly dynamics in the arrangements, the effect for me was of a dessert that’s slightly too sweet to taste properly. Although there is a broad enough dynamic range between quiet bits and loud bits, there’s precious little range within the loud bits, which more or less eliminates any potential for the music to sound raw or ragged.

Having said that, this style of punk stands at a particular historical point where that’s the norm, and Run For It are living in that world. They write songs that strike the exact balance of energy and melancholy, with that essential sense of nostalgia for the recent past, and they perform their material impeccably, from the heartfelt vocals to the highly skilled, and idiomatically precise, instrumental work. If contemporary pop-punk is your bag, you won’t go far wrong with this album, which oozes so much earnest intensity that I would challenge anyone to actually dislike it.

About these ads

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn

Like this:

Like Loading...
Tagged: electronica, industrial rock, pop-punk, post rock, post-metal, progressive rock, punk
Posted in: Uncategorized
← Monday Musing: Musical Experience and And The Location Of Meaning
Dementio13 – The Hobbyist (electronic post-rock) →
Be the first to start a conversation

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Oli


I'm a writer, and these are my friends.

Contact me:

reviews@arditi.org

Other places I can be found on the web

  • eBurban
  • Facebook
  • Live Unsigned
  • Oli's Adventures in Writingland
  • Twitter

Search oliverarditi.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 83 other followers

Twitter

  • @ThisIsEgo I can't promise a review but I'll give it a listen :-) 16 hours ago
  • @warriorgrrl @misterbenji Long time since I went to Bath, but as I recall the platforms smell FASCINATING there. 1 day ago
  • There's going to be a Joe Zawinul museum. Joe was one of my very favourite musicians. zawinulfoundation.org/news/the-zawin… 1 day ago
  • I was very excited to receive a review download of the full album yesterday. It is utterly sublime. Watch the trailer youtu.be/C-HRAOYdC4Y 1 day ago
  • @alunvaughan my pleasure, I hope there's more to come in that vein! 2 days ago

Archives

  • June 2013 (4)
  • May 2013 (4)
  • April 2013 (5)
  • March 2013 (3)
  • February 2013 (3)
  • January 2013 (6)
  • December 2012 (4)
  • November 2012 (5)
  • October 2012 (7)
  • September 2012 (6)
  • August 2012 (4)
  • July 2012 (4)
  • June 2012 (11)
  • May 2012 (10)
  • April 2012 (9)
  • March 2012 (10)
  • February 2012 (10)
  • January 2012 (11)
  • December 2011 (5)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (8)
  • September 2011 (9)
  • August 2011 (10)
  • July 2011 (24)
  • June 2011 (26)
  • May 2011 (20)
  • April 2011 (16)
  • March 2011 (1)

What I review:

People send me music faster than I can write about it, so I write about the submissions I like the most. I no longer actively solicit review materials, even if I absolutely love something. If you don't send it to me, I won't review it. If I pay for it, I won't review it. If it isn't (and won't be) available to my readers as a download or physical media, I won't review it. I enjoy listening to, and will review, music in any style whatsoever.

Submitting music for review:

If you have a physical package for your release, contact me for my address, as that's my preference, but if it's a download, just send me the link. When you submit digitally, I need the files on my hard disc: I won't review a stream. Music is reviewed in the order it's sent to me, but any physical releases I'm sent are reviewed first, followed by physical promos, and then digital submissions. Digital submissions need to arrive with all of their metadata (ID3 tags) correctly set – track, artist and album names typed as you want me to see them – and with the artwork attached. If the release doesn't archive in my iTunes library as a single album, or I need to type in any of the info myself, I'll just bin it. If you don't understand any of this, ask someone before you submit. Don't ask me. I will review your release based on the information you give me (a link to your website is fine), so if you want me to list the correct price, release date, label, catalogue number etc., that's down to you.

What I want in return:

I put a good deal of work into my reviews, and pay very close attention to your music: writing about someone's music is a responsibility I take as seriously as looking after someone else's child. In return, I ask two things. Firstly, please be patient: your release will be featured as soon I get time to write the review, and as soon as my site's schedule can accommodate it. Secondly, please promote my site. I'm trying to support artists with publicity, which works both ways, so if I post a review of your work, I really appreciate it if you link to it through all your usual promotional channels.
Blog at WordPress.com.
Theme: Inuit Types by BizzArtic.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 83 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: